Is it grammatically incorrect to use to after experience? I have prior experience to deal with various challenges. Here's an example from a canadian.
BIGGEST PIMPLE EVER! YouTube
The tables i was dealing with were in a research paper. I started well and had dug the garden and cleaned the car by 11 o’clock and, after a cup of coffee, i continued (dealing with the things on the list) [by] doing my homework. The value of shares, etfs and etcs bought through a share dealing account, a stocks and shares isa or a sipp can fall as well as rise, which could mean getting back less than you.
Should i put 'the' before southeast asian regions or not?
The value of shares, etfs and etcs bought through a share dealing account, a stocks and shares isa or a sipp can fall as well as rise, which could mean getting back less than you. The value of shares, etfs and etcs bought through a share dealing account, a stocks and shares isa or a sipp can fall as well as rise, which could mean getting back less than you. I had a list of. The value of shares, etfs and etcs bought through a share dealing account, a stocks and shares isa or a sipp can fall as well as rise, which could mean getting back less than you.
I learned it's inappropriate to put a definite article 'the' before proper nouns such as countries, a person's name, and so forth. I have prior experience in dealing with various challenges. No data could be provided for certain years in them, so 'n/a' was used in each such cell. The value of shares, etfs and etcs bought through a share dealing account, a stocks and shares isa or a sipp can fall as well as rise, which could mean getting back less than you.
Pues, por lo que sé, nunca es correcto decir 'be used to + infinitivo' (i'm used to deal) si te refieres a 'estar acostumbrado a hacer algo' sino que lo correcto.