Could you please help me? If you still have a valid sentence at that point, then you have the. Can i always substitute the one where the other is used, or is there a difference in meaning?
4 PM Weather Update Meteorologist Russell James will go over your
Research, published in 2011 by mike morrison and neal j. In short, because the english language has taken words from many other languages over the years, and with that borrowing of words comes the pronunciation that. Is assist in the same as assist with?
And do both kinds of.
In british english it's ok by me would be more idiomatic than it's ok with me, at least when it is something abstract like a color. If one is correct and the other is not, why? Do i say, i'd rather or i'll rather look? I want to write a sentence to a friend indicating that instead of looking at the one thing, it's better to look at something else.
If so, please quote their definitions, and what you think the right answer is (and why). We were provided with a form to fill. Which of the following is more correct: It's ok with me has a different meaning if.
I've looked up sit with in the dictionaries, but i couldn't find any definition that fits with the context.
That will help us answer your question more. If you and two other people were in a room, and you needed to ask them for water, would you say to them do either of you have water?, or does either of you have water?? Have you looked up with and within in a dictionary? In general, they're pretty similar and frequently.
When asking for something politely which sentence is a better/proper choice? We were provided a form to fill. Or could you help me please?
