We were provided a form to fill. If you still have a valid sentence at that point, then you have the correct. Is assist in the same as assist with?
Understanding Radar A Comprehensive Overview of How Radar Works, Its
If one is correct and the other is not, why? Or could you help me please? In short, because the english language has taken words from many other languages over the years, and with that borrowing of words comes the pronunciation that would be associated with.
Do i say, i'd rather or i'll rather look?
That will help us answer your question more specifically, and will. If you and two other people were in a room, and you needed to ask them for water, would you say to them do either of you have water?, or does either of you have water?? I've looked up sit with in the dictionaries, but i couldn't find any definition that fits with the context. I want to write a sentence to a friend indicating that instead of looking at the one thing, it's better to look at something else.
Research, published in 2011 by mike morrison and neal j. In british english it's ok by me would be more idiomatic than it's ok with me, at least when it is something abstract like a color. Could you please help me? If so, please quote their definitions, and what you think the right answer is (and why).
When asking for something politely which sentence is a better/proper choice?
We were provided with a form to fill. Have you looked up with and within in a dictionary? It's ok with me has a different meaning if it is a living. Can i always substitute the one where the other is used, or is there a difference in meaning?
Which of the following is more correct:
