Note that in some situations, like ebonics, you gonna is considered perfectly natural if not. You are welcome is a phrase i've said. Please clarify your specific problem or provide additional details to highlight exactly what you need.
Sukanya Guha on LinkedIn "You're missing out on 4 LinkedIn profile
In other words don't make noise while opening your beer when you open a beer, do it quietly. Keep on doing that” sounds more natural to me (but perhaps not to a speaker of. As i know if i wanted to say that someone is like someone/thing i'll say.
I'm writing some informal texts with some slang words, and i've been wondering if i should put are after you in some of them:
For the usage you are, you're gonna is more common. You are is normally contracted to you're in speech, because english doesn't like two vowels without a consonant to separate them, and one of them gets deleted. Is it grammatically correct to use that? You idiot or you're an idiot i want to know which one is correct because in the first one there is no auxiliary verb.
However, as a native english speaker in the us, i would absolutely say it's far more common to hear you're welcome. Since which i'm sure you are is a parenthetical comment, which can be omitted without changing the overall meaning, it should be set off by commas, dashes, or parentheses. When you are opening a beer, do it quietly. For the response to someone has thanked us?
The two sentences mean the same exact thing.
As it's currently written, it's hard to tell exactly what you're asking. Could we use "thank you too" I think it is understable with the same. You gonna is not unheard of but it's pretty sloppy.
It does not sound particularly idiomatic in american english except perhaps in a military context.
