True hey, years ago i came up with a formula for calculating expected winrates for pairs of champions given their overall winrates. Some people are saying u.gg is more accurate which isn't true. I'll give a brief explanation of asymmetric sampling, and provide a few.
Why Does My Face Lean To One Side at Neilson blog
Lolalytics is the one claimed to be closest to riot data that was u.gg regardless, lolalytics and u.gg are fairly similar. Has anyone gotten something similar? You guys really need to be aware on how lolalytics works according to lolalytics, in diamond+ riven has a 53.14% wr before we factor in the average winrate of the elo.
Many already have, and to be honest i already knew this, but i'm glad.
Lolalytics has slightly higher winrates overall for champs. All of the winrate data found on lolalytics is gathered using a practice i'll refer to as asymmetric sampling. I'm getting a report from my browser (edge) that lolalytics.com is unsafe. If i need info very quickly in champ select i get it from u.gg
Lolalytics analyses every ranked game played and now keeps the results for the entire patch. Even setting the lane and rank to the same, i picked a champion and found a 47% wr on op.gg, a 51%. Lolalytics is much better once you understand how it works. If another site doesn't match the number of games analysed then they are just.
Lolalytics is technically more accurate while.
