You gonna is not unheard of but it's pretty sloppy. In other words don't make noise while opening your beer when you open a beer, do it quietly. When you are opening a beer, do it quietly.
The Hidden C Trick That Turns Messy TryCatch Blocks into Elegant
As it's currently written, it's hard to tell exactly what you're asking. Since which i'm sure you are is a parenthetical comment, which can be omitted without changing the overall meaning, it should be set off by commas, dashes, or parentheses. I think it is understable with the same.
For the usage you are, you're gonna is more common.
For the response to someone has thanked us? You are is normally contracted to you're in speech, because english doesn't like two vowels without a consonant to separate them, and one of them gets deleted. Could we use "thank you too" The two sentences mean the same exact thing.
It does not sound particularly idiomatic in american english except perhaps in a military context. You are welcome is a phrase i've said. Note that in some situations, like ebonics, you gonna is considered perfectly natural if not. Is it grammatically correct to use that?
You idiot or you're an idiot i want to know which one is correct because in the first one there is no auxiliary verb.
As i know if i wanted to say that someone is like someone/thing i'll say. However, as a native english speaker in the us, i would absolutely say it's far more common to hear you're welcome. Keep on doing that” sounds more natural to me (but perhaps not to a speaker of. Please clarify your specific problem or provide additional details to highlight exactly what you need.
I'm writing some informal texts with some slang words, and i've been wondering if i should put are after you in some of them:
